Testimonies from Kpessa-Whyte, Rojo irrelevant to petition – Supreme Court

Must Read

Prez, Finance Minister’s cousin fingered in murky Frontier Healthcare deal

The Covid-19 Corruption Risk Assessment Report 2021 has cited Head of Virology at Noguchi Medical Research Institute, Prof. William...

Bawumia launches Fraud Control Dashboard to fight digital crime

Vice President Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia has launched  joint platform between telecom industry players, financial technology service providers, the Bank...

GES releases timetable for KG, Primary and JHS pupils on Ghana Learning TV as lessons start today

The Ghana Education Service (GES) in collaboration with the Ghana Broadcasting Corporation (GBC), has released the virtual learning timetable...

Justices of the Supreme Court who presided over the just-ended 2020 election case have revealed that the testimonies given by two of the petitioner’s witnesses completely had no bearing on the substantive matters that were before the court.

The witnesses in question are Dr. Michael Kpessa-Whye and Rojo Mettle-Nunoo who served as the petitioner’s second and third witnesses respectively. They represented the petitioner, John Mahama in the Electoral Commission’s national collation centre.

This was disclosed by Chief Justice Kwasi Anin-Yeboah when he read the full judgment on behalf of the seven-member Supreme Court panel on Thursday, March 4, 2021.

“The least said about the testimonies of Dr. Kpessa-Whyte and Mettle-Nunoo the better. The testimonies were fanciful.”

The judges however said General Secretary of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Aseidu Nketiah who was the first witness of the petitioner was, however, the “star witness” as he aided the trail through his cross-examination.

Justice Anin-Yeboah in the ruling mentioned that the testimonies of Dr. Kpessa-Whyte and Mettle-Nunoo “were therefore of no relevance to the said issues set out for determination, and so we find them unworthy for consideration whatsoever”.

It will be remembered that during the cross-examination of the duo who were representatives of the petitioner of the Electoral Commission’s national collation centre (strongroom), they made claims that the EC chair, Jean Mensa tricked them to go and see Mr. Mahama over some concerns that they had raised with collation process.

Just when they agreed to do that and left the EC’s premisses, Madam Mensa went ahead to declare the presidential results in their absence.

This is however in sharp contrast to their own admission of signing some documents to certify the results they were disputing.

But the Chief Justice said the decision by the two to leave the strong room was their own mistake and cannot fault anyone for it and cry foul.

“Notwithstanding all these allegations of misunderstandings with the chair of the 1st respondent in the strongroom and the fact that they were absent during the declaration, they did not give any indication as to how these happenings in their absence affected the final results announced by the 1st Respondent”, Justice Anin-Yeboah said.

“Having signed or certified these forms, the witnesses, particularly PW 3 [Mettle-Nunoo] cannot turn round to talk about irregularities in the forms,” he added.

Justice Anin-Yeboah was however quick to state that their testimonies would have carried some little weight if the purpose of the petition was to change entries made on the collation forms or summary sheets.

Submit your stories or articles to newsroom@abcnewsgh.com or Whatsapp them to +233 553620623

- Advertisement -


Latest News

European Super League not ‘dead’ despite withdrawals – Real Madrid president Florentino Perez

Real Madrid president Florentino Perez insists the European Super League is not "dead" despite the competition collapsing just 48...

More Articles Like This

%d bloggers like this: