Court stops perjury motion against Dr. Adu-Ampomah; cites prejudice

Must Read

I’ll expose you if you don’t stop talking “rubbish” about Rawlings – Koku Anyidoho warns Kwesi Pratt

A former Deputy General Secretary of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Koku Anyidoho has warned the Managing Editor...

Working With Rawlings: Nothing wrong with Prof. Naana Agyemang’s foreward – Prof. Gyampo

Political Science Lecturer at the University of Ghana, Prof. Ransford Gyampo has said there is nothing wrong with the...

Stop showing fake love to Voltarians- Dan Abodakpi fires NPP

The National Democratic Congress' Chairman of the Volta Regional Council of Elders, Mr Dan Abodakpi has slammed the New...

The Accra High Court today stopped an attempt by Mr Samuel Cudjoe, the lawyer for Dr Stephen Kwabena Opuni from moving a motion to commence a perjury trial against Dr. Yaw Adu-Ampomah, citing prejudice.

Mr Cudjoe filed a motion claiming that Dr. Adu-Ampomah, a witness for the prosecution, in the ongoing criminal case against his client, has not been truthful in his testimony to the court.

The judge, Justice Clemence Honyenuga, stopped the lawyer in his tracks and promptly ruled that the move will prejudice the main case and indicated that it will as well be unfair to the witness. He adjourned the motion indefinitely.

In his ruling, the judge cited a number of cases to make the point that, legal wisdom holds that the power to conduct a summary trial, such as in this case of alleged perjury, must be used sparingly and judiciously.

He noted that the judgements given in such summary trials – where the procedure is swifter and usually involves a lessening of the procedural requirements – must not precede the judgement of the main case, so as not to prejudice the case.

He added that the stated reason for which Dr Opuni’s lawyer is claiming that the third witness for the prosecution in the main trial against his client has perjured himself, must also be weighed against the totality of the testimony of the witness, so that judgment given, as to his guilt or otherwise for perjury, will be fair.

As such, in the instance where the witness, Dr. Adu-Ampomah, is presently undergoing cross-examination, it will be wise to not proceed with the perjury trial, until he is done with his testimony and the main trial has been concluded as well, hence the decision to disallow the perjury trial.

Mr Cudjoe filed the motion for perjury against Dr. Adu-Ampomah, who is a former Deputy Chief Executive at COCOBOD in Charge of Agronomy and Quality Control and the third witness for the prosecution in the ongoing trial of Dr Opuni and Seidu Agongo, following a series of testimonies in court, given by the witness about procurement practices at COCOBOD.


Source: ABC Newspaper

Submit your stories or articles to or Whatsapp them to +233 553620623

- Advertisement -


Latest News

Two Athletico Madrid players test positive for COVID-19

Two members of the travelling entourage of Diego Simeone's side have tested positive for Coronavirus. The latest development has cast...

Kenya’s military deployed to help fight fire outbreak in country’s biggest National Park

Kenya's military have been deployed to help put out a raging fire in its biggest National Park. The military has resorted to using different methods...

Covid-19: Putin approves vaccine for use

Russian President Vladimir Putin has given regulatory approval for use of a Coronavirus vaccine which was developed locally by Moscow’s Gamaleya Institute. Mr Putin stated...

NFA Action Group request for immediate reopening of cinemas

The National Film Authority’s Action Group has called on government to ease restrictions on cinemas amidst Coronavirus A member of the group, Cosby Bikpe stated...

Calls for corporal punishment out-of-place – Aku Hayfron

Clinical psychologist and lecturer at the Central University College, Aku Hayfron has watered down proposals for corporal punishment to be reintroduced in schools after...

More Articles Like This

%d bloggers like this: